When Madison Grant, Carleton Coon or Goldwin Smith can be taught in Universities without a warning label, I’ll believe there is such a thing as freedom of thought.  Until then I believe an attempted genocide is taking place.

I’ll also say this.  Blacks believe a genocide is taking place against them, and they are right.  The same ideology that attacks Whites is also being used against Blacks.  Is Obama really pro Black?

All peoples need to make sure we understand who the real enemy is.  Ahmed Ben Bella is one of the great figures of Arab nationalism.  To be a nationalist you have to be able to name who you are which means you must also be able to name who you are not.

A.B.B.: I myself, speaking as a man of the south, note that something has changed in the north, which is a very important point to raise. What changed exactly in this so-called advanced region of the north: that we have made a war, we have colonized, that we have done terrible things, and that there is today an opinion that is expressed, that there are young people who say “enough.” This indicates that this perverse global system does not strike only the south but also the north. In the past, we spoke of poverty, misery only in the south. Now there is a lot of misery, a lot of bad that creates victims in the north as well. This has become manifest: the global system was not made to serve the good of all, but to serve multinational companies.
Thus, deep from within this north, which we have so fought against, there is now a movement, there is an entire generation of youth who want to act, who go out onto the streets, who protest, even if the leftists did not know to give the key to the solution to these young people who want change. This has always occurred: all movements begin in this manner. The liberation movement which I led in Algeria, the organization that I created to fight the French army, was at first a small movement of nothing at all. We were but some tens of people throughout Algeria, a territory that is five times the size of France….I want to talk about what I observe here, in the West. I am convinced that the liberal system does not have a future. These young people, these high school students who I’ve seen go out onto the streets, who have nothing but their ideal of justice; these youths who demonstrate, who are on a quest for other values, I would love to say to them: “I began like that, when I was your age, by small steps. And little by little it was a mass of people who followed me.”

http://www.voltairenet.org/For-Ahmed-Ben-Bella-the-liberation

Should Israel be Forced into War…(tongue in cheek)

House Passes HR 4133 Binding the US to Israel and Their War Agenda

Without any mainstream media coverage at all, the House of Representatives passed the United States – Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 (USIESC).

The USIESC, written by Eric Cantor , claims there is a need to provide Israel with unlimited military and financial aid as a result of the disturbances caused by the Arab Spring.

Israel will have an essentially unlimited amount of funds allocated to them through the Federal Reserve Bank. The country will also enjoy an “expanded role of NATO” that consists of an “enhanced presence at NATO headquarters and exercises”.

The USIESC pledges the US government’s “commitment” to assist Israel in remaining a Jewish State; as well as protection from the UN if the UN Security Council resolves to hold Israel accountable to international laws.

The US government’s counter-terrorism unit will also aid Israel by any means.

This USIESC asserts that “supported by the American people” the US government will “repeatedly affirm the special bond between the United States and Israel” and that the two countries have “shared values and shared interests.”

If there were ever language to suppose that there were a merging of these two nations, the USIESC fits that bill.

The Executive Summary of USIESC says that “the following actions to assist in the defense of Israel” are:

(1) Provide Israel such support as may be necessary to increase development and production of joint missile defense systems, particularly such systems that defend the urgent threat posed to Israel and United States forces in the region.

(2) Provide Israel assistance specifically for the production and procurement of the Iron Dome defense system for purposes of intercepting short-range missiles, rockets, and projectiles launched against Israel.

(3) Provide Israel defense articles and defense services through such mechanisms as appropriate, to include air refueling tankers, missile defense capabilities, and specialized munitions.

(4) Allocate additional weaponry and munitions for the forward-deployed United States stockpile in Israel.

(5) Provide Israel additional surplus defense articles and defense services, as appropriate, in the wake of the withdrawal of United States forces from Iraq.

(6) Strengthen efforts to prevent weapons smuggling into Gaza pursuant to the 2005 Agreement on Movement and Access following the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and to protect against weapons smuggling and terrorist threats from the Sinai Peninsula.

(7) Offer the Israeli Air Force additional training and exercise opportunities in the United States to compensate for Israel’s limited air space.
(8) Expand Israel’s authority to make purchases under the Foreign Military Financing program on a commercial basis.

(9) Seek to enhance the capabilities of the United States and Israel to address emerging common threats, increase security cooperation, and expand joint military exercises.

(10) Encourage an expanded role for Israel within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), including an enhanced presence at NATO headquarters and exercises.

(11) Support extension of the long-standing loan guarantee program for Israel, recognizing Israel’s unbroken record of repaying its loans on time and in full.

(12) Expand already-close intelligence cooperation, including satellite intelligence, with Israel.

USIESC goes on to claim that: “Iran, (3) which has long sought to foment instability and promote extremism in the Middle East, is now seeking to (4) exploit the dramatic political transition underway in the region to undermine governments traditionally aligned with the United States and support extremist political movements in these countries.”

On the contrary, Israel and the US have been the biggest proponents of violence toward unprovoked nations in recent times. The collaboration of the US, Israel and NATO, with help from CIA operatives al-Qaeda and other US funded terrorist groups, have synthesized fake revolutions (i.e. the Arab Spring) to destabilize foreign governments and force regime changes.

Right now, al-Qaeda is being used by the Obama administration to force the Syrian President out of office through repeated attacks and massive killing of innocent Syrians.

In Africa, specifically the south Sudan region, Obama has teamed up with Israel to create the new nation of South Sudan by using terrorism to force their current government out.

USIESC continues its assault on Iran: “At the same time, (5) Iran may soon attain a nuclear weapons capability, a development that would fundamentally threaten vital American interests, destabilize the region, encourage regional nuclear proliferation, further empower and embolden Iran, (6) the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism, and (7) provide it the tools to threaten its neighbors, including Israel”.

Although publicly, both the Obama administration and the Israeli government have admitted that Iran has absolutely no intention of building nuclear weapons. Both governments assume that by using words like “they may” or “they might” denotes a definite intention to do so.

The Mullahs that have ultimate authority in Iran have stated numerous times that the acquisition and use of nuclear weapons goes against the law of Islam. Independent studies, outside of the US and Israeli reach, have also confirmed that not only does Iran not have nuclear weapons at present, but are not perusing their allocation.

To justify the fabricated “need” to assist Israel in remaining “safe” the USIESC states : “As a result, (8) the strategic environment that has kept Israel secure and safeguarded United States national interests for the past 35 years has eroded.”

At the present time, Israel is in possession of an estimated 200 – 300 nuclear weapons. They are the covert superpower of the world. Israel also enjoys one of the most intensive and explicit armies in the world. While Israel continues to invade the sovereign nations that surround them, they are not being invaded themselves.

The USIESC is a propaganda piece of legislation designed to set the stage for full military support of Israel when they launch an unprovoked strike against Iran. While now, there are campaigns to coerce a fake grassroots effort to force a regime change in Iran, the inevitability of war declarations are looming in the distance.

China and Russia have made it clear that they have absolutely no intention of ending their relations with Iran.

The distractions in the mainstream media concerning Obama are just that. The sudden inflation of gay rights in the political arena and other nonsensical and unimportant social memes are being touted as if they will define our nation.

The USIESC has clearly set a precedent and definition of who America is.

The Obama administration, under careful control of the global Elite, is consolidating powers with Israel in a joint effort to take over the world . . . by toppling one government at a time.

http://occupycorporatism.com/house-passes-hr-4133-binding-the-us-to-israel-and-their-war-agenda/

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr4133/text

And Get Use to Foreign Military on OUR SOIL…in case we start thinking the U.S. is our country

Posted: 05/22/2012

  • By: Vicky Benchimol

TAMPA – Residents and those working in and around Harbor Island today can expect to encounter road closures and loud noise from explosions and gunfire.

It’s an inconvenience but nothing to be worried about.  It’s all part of a military mock battle demonstration organized by U.S. Special Operations Forces.

Franklin Street from Channelside to Harbor Island and Old Waters between Florida and Channelside will be closed from 12 noon until 3:00 p.m.

If you are near downtown, you are invited to watch the mock battle which will take place from about 1:00p.m. to 1:30p.m.  Best place for viewing will be the areas near the water close to the Tampa Convention Center and Harbor Island Bridge.

The mock battle will be based on a hostage-rescue scenario and will include a ground assault with Ground Mobility Vehicles and All-Terrain Vehicles, maritime assault with Rigid Hull Inflatable, MH-60 Blackhawk fastrope insertion, CV-22 Osprey tilt-rotor demonstration, helocast infiltration from an MH-47 Chinook,  Boats, and a Military Free Fall water jump.

Special Operations Forces from the United States, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Jordan, Norway, Poland, Thailand and the United Arab Emirates are all participating in the demonstration.

Officials say the public is in no danger as long as they stay outside of the area cordoned off by police.

Read more: http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/news/region_tampa/road-closures-explosions-and-gunfire-expected-in-us-special-forces-mock-battle-wednesday#ixzz1w0UahrlG

BDS… Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions

As seen on Zionist Lite Mondoweiss

AND THIS..

The government is preparing a mass deportation of refugees back to their South Sudan homeland. Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein next week will argue before the Jerusalem District Court that there is no legal obstacle to the expulsions since individual checks will establish that none of them faces any threat to their lives in South Sudan.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/israel-prepares-mass-deportation-of-south-sudanese-refugees-1.432260

AND THIS

http://www.thenational.ae/news/world/middle-east/israels-treatment-of-ethiopians-racist#page1

This Warants Investigation…

In reply to an earlier post on Jul 30, 2011 7:48:17 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Jul 30, 2011 8:11:25 PM PDT
Benjamin Steigmann says:
As for the civil rights controversy, I suggest reading “It’s Very simple”: https://sites.google.com/site/heavenlybanner/its-very-simple-the-true-story-of-civil-rightsErnie Lazar is completely wrong about the U.S Arms Control & Disarmament Agency and the intentions of CFR/RIIA leaders. i’ll address that all as one argument:

Arnold Toynbee was very important in Royal Institute of International Affairs circles, being the RIIA director of studies. Given that position, he certainly would be qualified to state the intentions and objectives of that group, and sister organizations (like the CFR). As recorded in the RIIA’s own journal, Toynbee said that “We are at present working discreetly but with all our might, to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world. And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local national states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or a publicist can be, perhaps not quite burnt at the stake, but certainly ostracized and discredited.” (International affairs: journal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, Volume 10, p. 809): http://tinyurl.com/3zt7crq

Lionel Curtis (the leader of the Round Table movement which became the RIIA and CFR) wished for the League of Nations to be a World government with teeth, writing articles with H.G. Wells urging this:
1) http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/19jan/leag119.htm
2) http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/19feb/leag219.htm

They ultimately got what they wanted. Articles 10-16 of the the Covenant of the League of Nations provided for a World Army: http://mailstar.net/c20-doc.html

Similarly, at the end of World War II, Bernard Baruch pushed for a World Government with atomic powers. Stalin was a bit of a Buonapartist and refused to comply. Bertrand Russell, supposedly a “pacifist” (in reality a One Worlder who wanted disarmament of nation states and armament of a World Government) thus urged pre-emptive nuclear War on the Soviet Union. As Sutton showed, massive aid to the Soviets continued all throughout the Cold War. Sutton noted the extent of this aid in testimony before Subcommittee VII of the Platform Committee of the Republican Party at Miami Beach, Florida, August 15, 1972:

“In a few words: there is no such thing as Soviet technology. Almost all – perhaps 90-95 percent – came directly or indirectly from the United States and its allies. In effect the United States and the NATO countries have built the Soviet Union. Its industrial and its military capabilities. This massive construction job has taken 50 years. Since the Revolution in 1917. It has been carried out through trade and the sale of plants, equipment and technical assistance.”

You can read about the Baruch Plan here: http://mailstar.net/baruch-plan.html

The Baruch Plan didn’t get implemented right away, but instead, it was implemented Fabian style.

State Department Publication No. 7277 – entitled “Freedom From War”, written in 1961 (which corresponds to Public Law 87-297) stated the following:

p. 10:

“The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.”

it also called for (p. 11):

“The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force”

it also called for (p. 12):

“The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to ensure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.”

This was later updated in a document entitled Blueprint for the Peace Race.

This becomes especially infuriating when you consider the information disclosed in Sutton’s Hoover Institution studies, showing that this “threat” was assisted all along, and built up to act as the anti-thesis, leading to a new synthesis.

Public Law 101-216 reinforces Public Law 87-297, and was passed on October 12, 1989.

Facsimiles of all these documents, and more, are in the following pdf file from a pro-gun organization. You can ignore the commentary, and just focus on the documentation, which is very important. See especially p. 215 of the pdf: http://www.libertygunrights.com/doubterbinder/Doubter%20Binder%20-%20High%20Quality%20-%20Complete.pdf

So we can see that Smoot’s observations about Walter Millis’s sentiments were much more in line with actual reality, and that Millis was engaging in double speak. A complete refutation of Ernie’s argument on the issue is to be found here: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/un_exposed/un_exposed09.htm

See also the following: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDMeDmV0ufU

Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote in “The Grand Chessboard” about how the U.S. war machine will force the process of Globalism on defiant nations in order to standardize them into the Global system, that simultaneously the U.S. and other Western Powers would be submerged in a Web of International arrangements that would form the fetus of a World Government (happening now), and that ultimately the American Empire would pave the way for a revivified UN with teeth to take charge.

For more on that, see “The United Nations Exposed”: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/un_exposed/un_exposed.htm

SOURCE:

Arthur Rudolph

Until 1930 I sympathized with the social democratic party, voted for it and was a member of a socialdemocratic union (Bund Techn. Agst. u. Beamt.) After 1930 the economical situation became so serious that it appeared to me to be headed for catastrophe. (I really became unemployed in 1932.) The great amount of unemployment caused expansion of nationalsoc. and communistic parties. Frightened that the latter one would become the government I Joined the NSDAP (a legally reg. entity) to help, I believed in the preservation of the western culture.[5]

And Yet Another Post Counter-Currents Publishing Refuses to Post…

http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/05/the-ethics-of-killing-all-white-babies/

Doug McAdam talks about the last above-ground Weatherman conference discussing whether the only final solution to the white problem was to kill all white babies.  The conclusion was that it was the right thing to do.  Youtube has since pulled the video

 

My Response

Killing White babies.  With this in mind people should evaluate Breivik. Frankly the only difference I see is that Breivik actually did it.  Johan Galtung stated that there is a possible link between Anders Behring Breivik, responsible for massacring dozens of children in Norway last summer, and Jewish and Israeli factions. http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/pioneer-of-global-peace-studies-hints-at-link-between-norway-massacre-and-mossad-1.427385

Some more of Billy the shilly: https://niqnaq.wordpress.com/2012/05/06/bill-ayers-and-bernadine-dohrn-calling-for-resistance/

Pretzel-Shaped Thinking

‘pretzel-shaped thinking’ explained

A rare account of pretzel-shaped intelligence strategies can be found in “The Occult Technology of Power,” Section 9:

As massive as our intelligence community has become in itself, we still operate strictly on the finance capitalist principle of leverage. Just as a rational finance capitalist never owns more stock in a corporation than the bare minimum required for control, intelligence operatives are placed only in as many key positions as are required to control the target organizations. Our goal, after all, is agent control of all significant organizations, not intelligence community membership for the entire population. The organizational pattern of baffling “circles within circles,” characteristic of classical secret societies, is retained and refined by our intelligence community. That “one hand not know what the other is doing” is essential to the success of our operations. In most cases, we do not allow the operatives themselves to know the ultimate, and when possible, even the short-range objectives of their assignments. They operate under “covers” that disguise our goals not only from the public and target groups, but from the agents themselves.

For instance, many agents operating under “left cover” are led to believe that the agency, or at least their department, is secretly, but sincerely motivated by socialistic ideology. Thus, they assume that the intelligence agency’s ultimate goal is to guide left-wing groups in “productive” directions, even though they cannot always see how their own assignment fits into those assumed goals. Other “left-cover” agents, those with right-wing predilections, are encouraged to believe the agency is simply “monitoring” violence-prone subversive groups in order to protect the public. When such agents are asked to participate in or even lead radical activity they assume that the ultimate objective is to fully infiltrate and destroy the organization for the good of the country. This is very seldom the case. We waste little or no money protecting the “public” or defending the “nation.” Agents operating under “right-cover” are handled in symmetrical fashion. Agents with right-wing prejudices are encouraged to believe the agency is right-wing. Left-prejudiced agents are asked to operate under “right-cover” in order to “monitor” dangerous rightist organizations.

Most intelligence agents remain blithely ignorant of the big picture which is so clear to us from our spectacular vantage point. Very few have enough information or intelligence to reason out how their specific and sometimes baffling assignments promote the legislative, judicial, operational and propaganda needs of our Money Power. Most would never try. They are paid too much to think about such things. Agents with a “gangster-cover” are of two types. First, there is the sincere gangster that draws his salary from an intelligence agency. He is led to believe that the gangland “Godfathers” control the government agency for their own purposes. Actually, the situation is the opposite. The agency controls the gangster for other purposes. Second, is the sincere crime fighter who is led to believe that the agency is at tempting to infiltrate and monitor the gangsters as a preliminary step to destroying organized crime. Such “upstanding” agents commit many crimes in their zeal to rid the country of organized crime!…

https://niqnaq.wordpress.com/2012/05/05/pretzel-shaped-thinking-explained/

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/warning-corporate-lobbyist-at-work.html

Friday, May 4, 2012

Warning: Corporate Lobbyist At Work

How big money distorts reality by dominating both sides of every debate. by Tony Cartalucci
May 5, 2012- Like a tentacle of a sea monster breaking the surface of the water, a recent news story starring a “libertarian” think-tank’s billboard comparing “climate change” proponents to Theodore Kaczynski (also known as the Unabomber) represents but a small part of a much larger beast.

Image: While in reality those behind “climate change” hysteria dwarf the threat of Kaczynski, the Heartland Institute is funded by corporations backing just such people. What we are left with is a false paradigm where both sides are controlled by the same corporate-financier interests producing a strategy of tension with which to see through their agenda and prevent real issues and solutions from being realized.

….

Like in any movie script, the billboard put up by the Heartland Institute is designed to play the role of the villain. Heroically riding in to fight this villain is “Think Progress,” a so-called “progressive” project maintained by the Center for American Progress. To the average, poorly informed observer, it appears as if an increasingly heated debate over man’s impact on the environment is unfolding, framed by a vitriolic “denier” camp reduced to name-calling, with a dignified progressive camp refusing to move from its foundation of “reason” and “science.”
In reality we are watching two think-tanks funded, backed, and involved with the very same handful of corporations. Both the Heartland Institute and the Center for American Progress are funded by Wall Street and together they create a false paradigm with which to trap unassuming millions while sidelining real issues, problems, and their solutions.
Think Progress itself exposes the Heartland Institute as funded by major corporations including Amgen, Bayer, Comcast, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly & Company, Microsoft, PepsiCo, General Motors, Pfizer, and Time Warner Cable. It then berates these corporations for their support for the Heartland Institute in a more recent article of theirs titled, “Heartland Institute Compares Climate Science Believers And Reporters To Mass ‘Murderers And Madmen’.” The US Chamber of Commerce is also listed as a contributor to the Heartland Institute in a .pdf provided by Think Progress.
What Think Progress doesn’t tell readers is that these very same corporations are recipients of their own John Podesta’s lobbying services – because indeed Think Progress and its umbrella organization, the Center for American Progress is chaired by John Podesta, co-founder of the Podesta Group - a notorious corporate lobbying firm involved with some of the most dubious characters and corporations on Earth. Amongst Podesta’s clients are the above mentioned Amgen and General Motors, as well as BAE Systems, General Dynamics, General Electric, Raytheon, British Petroleum, Lockheed Martin, and many others.

Video: Meet the founder of the United Nations Foundation, depopulation and climate change enthusiast Ted Turner previously of Time Warner. Turner peddles Malthusian talking-points on national TV attempting to link overpopulation with global warming. And while Turner is no longer with Time Warner, its subsidiary Time Inc is still a corporate partner of the UN Foundation while Time Warner itself is listed as a supporter of the Heartland Institute – guilty of “climate denial.” The Fortune 500 is replete with examples of corporations playing both sides of the climate debate.

….

To fully illustrate this false paradigm, it should be mentioned that one of the patrons of the Heartland Institute and their “climate denial” – Time Warner – though its subsidiary Time Inc is also a corporate partner of the United Nations Foundation – a premier promoter of climate change hysteria. Time Warner’s Ted Turner created the foundation with a 1 billion dollar donation and is an outspoken “global warming” and “overpopulation” activist. Joining Time Warner in partnering with the UN Foundation is the Bill & Malinda Gates Foundation, also prominent global climate change activists. Bill Gates being founder and a current chairman at Microsoft – is also a sponsor of “climate denial” at the Heartland Institute.
The Podesta Group openly admits that it conducts media campaigns including planting op-eds in popular newspapers including the Christian Science Monitor and the Huffington Post. The Podesta Group features a “PG At Work” segment on each page of its website showcasing such articles, written either by journalists approached by the lobbying firm, or by Podesta Group members themselves, often never disclosing their affiliations. Similarly, Podesta openly admits it “arranges” for Senators to make specific floor speeches. When one wonders the “how” regarding corporate-financier interests purchasing our elected representatives and manipulating our press, the answer is lobbying firms like Podesta. Ensuring the public goes along with such a flagrant abuse of power and influence is left to the creation of false paradigms, false choices, and emotionally charged misdirecting debates.
By the same corporations funding a vicious debate moderated by professional lobbyists in their employ, the corporate-financier elite ensure that the public is herded into a matrix of false choices where both real problems and their solutions are non-issues and instead an endless circular debate mired in infinite minutia is conducted. Regardless of which public opinion prevails regarding anthropogenic global warming, the corporate-financier oligarchs have institutions and legislation in place to capitalize, be it big-oil or carbon-credit trading big-banks.
Not Just Climate Change.
Climate change is not the only issue where both sides of the debate are dominated by the same interests for the purpose of maintaining a false paradigm and an effective strategy of tension. Just recently, another media circus was erected around a Chinese “activist,” Chen Guangcheng.
Chen had been built up since at least 2008 by another PR firm of sorts, the US State Department’s National Endowment for Democracy and its various subsidiaries including Freedom House, the International Republican Institute (IRI), and the National Democratic Institute (NDI). Like Podesta, NED not only plants op-eds across the corporate-media, but maintains a global network of clearinghouses it funds with US taxpayers’ money. One such example, Thailand’s Prachatai, is fully funded by NED, USAID, and convicted criminal George Soros‘ Open Society Institute (also a sponsor of the above mentioned Center for American Progress). On a daily basis, Prachatai regurgitates US State Department talking points, while masquerading as an “independent” media organization.
Together, these fraudulent media clearinghouses with Congressional members of NED, IRI, and NDI, turn a nameless, inconsequential “activist” or a contrived human rights issue into an international point of contention – not for the cause of human rights, but to be used as leverage for geopolitical and financial concessions. In China’s case, Chen was used as a PR stunt in the lead up to high-profile talks between Washington and Beijing.
And just like with the climate change issue, indeed, the very injustice Chen Guangcheng was protesting, with US money and support, was a creation of the West itself – namely China’s draconian population control policies, funded by the UN with the US the primary donor to its “Population Fund.”
The “War on Terror” is yet another false paradigm, both created and perpetuated by the West, while it simultaneously “fights” against it. In fact, many of the most adamant proponents of the “War on Terror” are literally lobbying for the US State Department-listed foreign terror organization (#29) Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK) of Iran, while others are calling on the US to fund, arm, and politically recognize listed terror organizations like the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) of Libya, and terrorists currently destabilizing Syria.

http://webproxy.ru/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL3RoZWNhYmxlLmZvcmVpZ25wb2xpY3kuY29tL2ZpbGVzL2dpdWxpYW5pMV8wLmpwZw%3D%3D

Image: Rudy Giuliani consorting with MEK’s political wing leader Maryam Rajavi in Paris, France. Giuliani is best known for his role playing a strong supporter for the “War on Terror” and his incessant fear mongering verses “Islamic extremists.” In real life, he coddles listed terrorist organizations in direct violation of US law and even lobbies for them.

….

While some may be confused as to why one would simultaneously perpetuate a war while trying to end it, the answer is quite simple – the trillions the US is spending to fight the endless “War on Terror” is not going into a black hole, rather, it is going to a myriad of defense contractors while building the foundation for other large corporate-financier interests to plunder nations previously beyond America’s geopolitical and financial reach – the ultimate goal being to turn the entire planet into a borderless playground for the corporate-financier oligarchs of Wall Street and London.