The River-Merchant’s Wife

After Li Po

While my hair was still cut straight
     across my forehead
I played at the front gate, pulling
You came by on bamboo stilts, playing
You walked about my seat, playing with
     blue plums.
And we went on living in the village of
Two small people, without dislike or

At fourteen I married My Lord you.
I never laughed, being bashful.
Lowering my head, I looked at the wall.
Called to, a thousand times, I never
     looked back.

At fifteen I stopped scowling,
I desired my dust to be mingled with
Forever and forever and forever.
Why should I climb the lookout?

At sixteen you departed,
You went into far Ku-to-en, by the river
     of swirling eddies,
And you have been gone five months.
The monkeys make sorrowful noise

You dragged your feet when you went
By the gate now, the moss is grown,
     the different mosses,
Too deep to clear them away!
The leaves fall early this autumn, in
The paired butterflies are already
     yellow with August
Over the grass in the West garden;
They hurt me.  I grow older.
If you are coming down through the
     narrows of the river Kiang,
Please let me know beforehand,
And I will come out to meet you
          As far as Cho-fu-sa.

the point is not that we all already know this, the point is that it could not be printed by the grauniad (of course) or even the independent (which prints fisk practically every day)


… nothing less than a total boycott of everything Israeli is now a measure of basic human decency… (Yes – H)

Originally posted on Niqnaq:

Breaking the last taboo: Gaza and the threat of world war
John Pilger, Sep 11 2014

This article is adapted from John Pilger’s Edward Said Memorial Lecture, delivered in Adelaide, Australia, on Sep 11 2014.

“There is a taboo,” said the visionary Edward Said, “on telling the truth about Plastelina and the great destructive force behind Israel. Only when this truth is out can any of us be free.” For many people, the truth is out now. At last, they know. Those once intimidated into silence can’t look away now. Staring at them from their TV, laptop, phone, is proof of the barbarism of the Israeli state and the great destructive force of its mentor and provider, Usaia, the cowardice of Euian governments, and the collusion of others, such as Canada and Australia, in this epic crime. The attack on Gaza was an attack on all of us. The siege…

View original 3,832 more words

A Death in Finland


The Bankster’s role in the Russian ( read jewish) revolution.

Originally posted on a.nolen:

Leonid Andreyev stands before one of his own drawings, 1909.

Leonid Andreyev stands before one of his own drawings, 1909.

A few months ago, I wrote about Leonid Andreyev’s final book, Satan’s Diary. This is an extraordinary work that probably inspired Mikhail Bulgakov’s The Master and Margarita.

What’s remarkable about Andreyev’s book is that it describes rich Americans’ role in the Russian Revolution via the fictionalized account of ‘Henry Wondergood’. Wondergood is actually Satan, who masquerades as a billionaire philanthropist from Illinois. The history which Satan’s Diary describes is dangerous to talk about even today.

The only non-fiction book I’m aware of that tries to explain rich Americans’ involvement in setting up the Bolshevik government is Anthony Sutton’s Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution. It’s not often discussed in ‘safe’ historical research, because that type of ‘research’ is usually funded by bequests from wealthy philanthropists. From

Professor Richard Pipes of Harvard said in his book, Survival…

View original 1,596 more words

Some Interesting History…

This from the book THE NEW UNHAPPY LORDS by A. K. Chesterton.  Which military and governmental men are in the hire of the bernie baruch(s) today do you think?

THE ambivalence of post-war American policy, created
by the conflicting objectives of “containing Communism”
to satisfy the American Congress and American opinion,
and at the same time to help to promote it, in obedience
to the great financial interests which had played so large
a part in establishing and maintaining the Soviet Union,
was only superficially a part of Roosevelt’s war-time policy.
As we now know, his golden rule throughout that time was
to deny the Communists nothing and in every conflict of
view between Russia and the Western allies to take the
Russian side. To that extent it was a simple policy and
of multitudinous instances two or three, for present purposes,
must suffice. Mention has been made of Roosevelt’s
lying assurance to Premier Mikolajczyk that after the war
Poland’s pre-war frontiers would be restored. At the same
interview Mikolajczyk informed the American President
that broadcasts to Poland and other Eastern European
countries by the Voice of America consisted of blatant
Communist propaganda. Roosevelt gave a solemn promise
that the propaganda would be stopped at once, whereas
it was not only maintained until the end of the war
but continued long afterwards. Either Roosevelt was a
brazen humbug or he was the dupe of the New York Power
Elite which had riddled his Administration with Communist
agents who disobeyed his instructions and fed him
with false information. History must resolve the problem
as to what extent he was a conscious and to what extent an
unconscious tool of the Money Power.
Another instance was the over-running of Malaya and
Singapore by the Japanese. The defence of these countries
was entrusted to an R.A.F. Command which had only a
few hundred obsolete planes at its disposal. By the time the
Japanese struck the British aircraft industry was turning
out fighters and bombers in spate. Why were these modern
planes not sent to defend British possessions in Malaya?
The answer is that most of them were being flown to
Russia to reinforce the Red Army. The United States had
now assumed the dominant role in the planning of allied
war production and distribution, and it was the U.S. order
of priorities which had to be observed. As a consequence,
when Churchill sent H.M.S. Repulse and H.M.S. Prince of
Wales to Malayan waters there were no fighter planes to
provide adequate air cover, with the result that these two
mighty men-o’-war were sunk—and with them, for all
practical purposes, was sunk our Empire in the East. It is
improbable that either Stalin or Bernard Baruch, the effective
head of the Money Power, had tears to shed over the
A third instance concerns the development of the atombomb.
Great Britain, through the researches of the great
Rutherford, Soddy and other scientists, led the world in
knowledge of how to split the atom. The results of these
researches were placed at the disposal of the United States
subject only to one condition—that when the know-how of
the construction of the actual bombs was discovered it should
be communicated to the British Government. This agreement
the United States dishonoured. In later years, when
the McCarran Act was passed forbidding the communication
to other powers of U.S. atomic secrets, Congress had
no idea of the secret agreement with the British. Prime
Minister Attlee made no attempt to enlighten Congress and
Winston Churchill told the House of Commons that he
would have acted in Attlee’s default but that President
Truman had asked him not to. How completely had the
senescent British Lion been mesmerised by the American
Eagle, or if not by the Eagle, then by the glint in the
Baruchian glasses, which amounted to much the same
thing! Yet while the British were thus abominably betrayed,
the Americans were sending case-loads of secret atomic
formulae to Moscow, together with quantities of processed
uranium. Major Jordan, of the U.S.A.A.F., who had the
task of despatching these materials, protested, but was
given personal orders by Harry Hopkins to forward the
consignments. Readers new to the subject may ask: “Who
was this man Hopkins?” He had been an obscure charityorganiser
when Roosevelt summoned him and gave him
complete charge of all the millions of dollars distributed as
part of the New Deal. Clearly, therefore, he was a key-man
in somebody’s service. During the war Hopkins moved into
the White House, without official position or salary, and
access to the President could only be had through him.
Who was paying this master-agent? In all likelihood he
was being paid, directly or indirectly, by Bernard Baruch.
At all events, one day when he said something not too
flattering about Baruch, Roosevelt rebuked him. “Harry,”
said the President, “remember all that Bernie has done for
But by far the most important dispositions favouring
Russia were those which received the seal of official
approval at Yalta. As a result of decisions reached at that
conference, at which Roosevelt’s chief expert assistant was
Alger Hiss, in after years sent for a long term of imprisonment
for perjury relating to the fact that he was a Communist
agent, Eisenhower later held back troops of the
Western Allies from taking Berlin and Prague, which they
were poised to do, so that the Red Army might be the
first to enter these capitals. What happened to the women
of Berlin is unspeakable, and it did not happen by accident.
Eisenhower then withdrew his forces, in some sectors as
much as 150 miles, and thus allowed the Mongolian hordes
to occupy the European heartlands. Never has there been
a betrayal of Christendom on so monumental a scale. History
will record that Roosevelt contrived it, with poor old
Churchill tagging helplessly along, but it does not do to
forget that behind Roosevelt was the cold, calculating brain
of Bernard Mannes Baruch.
During Eisenhower’s Presidency of the United States he
cut short one of his vacations to open a park in New York
which Baruch had founded in honour of his own father.
In his speech Eisenhower made a remarkable admission.
“Twenty-five years ago,” he said, “as a young and unknown
Major, I took the wisest step in my life—I consulted
Mr. Baruch.” Wise step, indeed! When war broke out
Eisenhower was jumped over the heads of at least 150 of
his seniors to be placed in supreme command of the Allied
Forces in Europe—certainly remarkable promotion for an
officer without battle experience or the experience of
handling large masses of men in the field. What interpretation
can be put upon it other than that Eisenhower was
Baruch’s man, not only in exercising the supreme command
but later as President of the United States?


BTW, I would like to remind you that AFTER the war Ike killed an estimated 1.5 million German men and boys in his POW camps in Europe.  They starved and died of exposure.  We made him president.  The father eats sour grapes and the son’s teeth are set on edge.

I would also like to offer this idea.  The Rosenbergs were useful idiots.  They provide the fig leaf as to how the Russians got the atomic bomb when the reality is our government (being in the control of the baruchians) gave it to the Soviets.  Or maybe Ethel and Julius were happy to give their lives so the big jew could control the world.  I wonder how their boys are doing today???? Ahhhh, here it is from the NYT:

Today, both brothers are grandfathers. Michael, 65, is a professor and chairman of the economics department at Western New England College in Springfield, Mass. Robert, 61, is a lawyer and runs the Rosenberg Fund for Children, which advocates on behalf of young people whose parents have suffered because of their progressive politics. Both live in western Massachusetts.

Robert’s daughter Rachel is a lawyer with the Center for Constitutional Rights. In 2004, Michael’s daughter, Ivy, produced a documentary about the case, “Heir to an Execution.” In that film, Michael recalled the other day, he said he was “perfectly happy to live with the ambiguity” about the case. But that ambiguity, as far as his father is concerned, ended last week with Mr. Sobell’s confession and left Mr. Meeropol philosophical but, presumably, less happy.

Perhaps the rosenbergs will be called on again to help the cause…wonder if robert would defend a national socialist :-)  Is “progressive” a code word for big jew politics?

London Forum–Ken O’Keefe–Zionism is Doomed


Bravo! I agree with almost everything O’Keefe said. The only place I differ is the assumption that if only everyone had the facts then the conclusion would be the same, peace. I differ because I believe races differ, not only in the physical but in the mental process as well. We view reality differently. Questions of superiority are in this matter completely beside the point and need not be address here. We have all made it this far and so we all have evolved to be the best we can be to this point. Circumstances dictate superiority or inferiority on isolated scales, no more. Superiority as a general characteristic doesn’t make sense. We need to truly respect that difference and not assume with sufficient education or money or whatever the differences will go away because they won’t. I don’t want to see the jew die off anymore than I want to see hyenas die off but I am aware they are different even dangerous to me and I must interact with them accordingly.

Originally posted on Fig Trees and Vineyards:

“We know this is bullshit, and we don’t like the Israelis.”

You would hardly expect to hear such words from an American FBI agent.

View original 226 more words